ヴィデオ英語版は、このシーンのオマンコ記事が書いてあるのもあるけど写真ギャラリーにはなくてごめんね。
同じショットのヴィデオはここにあります: NEW TOY - 2016年11月23日.
ヴィデオ英語版は、このシーンのオマンコ記事が書いてあるのもあるけど写真ギャラリーにはなくてごめんね。
同じショットのヴィデオはここにあります: NEW TOY - 2016年11月23日.
Not sure if I like the metal speculum. I do like her vagina however.
Congratulations new speculum debut! This speculum seems spread the omanko wider. I want to see maximum spreaded omanko. There might be 13 notches. And Bambi only uses the third notch from narrow position. Try 4th, 5th and 6th and more! The wider the better and show your deep inside! やったー、可愛い子に新しいスペキュラムだ!これオマンコ凄く広げられそうだな。こいつで目一杯おっ広げたの見たいな。このスペキュラム13個調整できるみたいだけどこのバンビちゃんはちっちゃい方の3番目しか使ってないじゃん。4、5、6番目も使ってもっと広げて奥の方まで見せてくれー!
Metal speculum looks very medically, and this is not good. It looks not agreeably - delicate body of a woman and the cold metal with sharp edged. No sense. No need to look for novelty - at the cost of quality!
Agree, love the pussy but not the metal speculum. Much prefer the clear plastic. It allows us to see more. Exclusive club has a clear plastic Collins speculum. That works very well. Really opens up the vagina with minimal hardware blocking the view of the girls parts. My favorite speculum.
I don't think the material is the factor here but how it is positioned which it did not go in enough to reveal the cervix. Plastic or metal with this position it isn't getting a clear view.
I like the new speculum type. I just think that Bambi is too tight to really show the gapes that this thing is able to provide. Looking forward to seeing it in a huge cunt.
I feel for you guys... you do something to try to make everyone happy and then have to take criticism. I appreciate the effort. I really do. I DO however have to agree with the comments about metal looking too 'medical'. Like its a medical fetish site. And a 'huge cunt' (in my opinion) should NEVER have a speculum in it. What's the point? To me, the goal isn't to see cervix by whatever means are necessary - the goal (not easy to reach) is to see a big pussy held invitingly open as wide as possible by a smiling, sexy young woman for my erotic fantasy enjoyment, and not for my medical curiosity. That's just my opinion, but I wanted to put it out there. Thank you for your efforts and keep up the good work.
Really like the new speculum and definatately agree with
EAGER , would love to see her crancked open to the max setting, but this model just doesent have the pussy for it. She is way too small so probably not a very good test for the new toy. We need to get this on a model that can accomodate it and doesnt mind gaping to the max. Would also like to see it inserted sideways for a different view.
Typical situation for our site - half of our members don't like it, half of them love it. Why am I not surprised? :-D
We had feedback that the plastic speculums suck and we should get the new metal ones. One of our members was kind enough to help us get these new metal speculums. Now another group of members think the plastic ones are better.
Once I read an interview with an owner of a very successful adult business. He said "you have to be self-confident. Ignore the customers and do it your way. If you do a good job, the customers will come anyway even if you don't fulfill all their wishes". Maybe we should start ignoring requests to become successful? :-) Maybe listening to customers' wishes is our weakness and we're always punished for that...
My advice would be to always listen, but to ultimately always be true to your vision for the site. You'll can't always make everyone happy, so just do what makes YOU happy! For the record, anytime I'm critical, I always try to do so respectfully and express things as MY opinion only. I don't expect every set you produce to 'do it' for me. But enough of them always do to keep me here. My guess is that is also how most of the others here see things as well, so don't get discouraged!
You've spoiled us so bad! :)
You're right :-) We will of course always listen to feedback (and our overall "customer support" is also what differs us from most typical adult sites), it's just that we won't necessarily change our strategy just because 4-5 people ask for something in the comments. Of course, in some cases (such as Alex) we have to admit that we made a mistake. But in most other cases (lesbians, speculums, toys etc. etc.) there are always two groups of people with different opinions and we'll be doing what WE want, not what a couple people request or protest against :-)
I think PJGirls way of CS(customer satisfaction) is correct. The basic is to enjoy gaping omanko view anyway. To accomplish this might be lots of different approaches and searching the best way itself is very fun I believe. Move, move , move guys!! PJGirlsのやり方はいいんじゃない?とにかくバックリでっかく広げたオマンコが見られりゃよし。いろんなやり方あるけどそれを探すのも面白いと思う。どんどん行こうぜ!
Yes, Mr. Administrator, I believe that someone dared you to name a speculum metal. I would asked myself the question, who may be interested in a medical gadget? I think that the only guys who did not get on the medical studies at the direction of gynecology , and who had some strange ideas about the nature of the work. I am sure that the global market for adult movies are companies which arranges video in recording studios, which are imitated gynecological office and ordinary examination with medical tools. Please do not go that way :)
I dont personally believe that the type of speculum used is a big factor in my enjoyment of the content. However if I cannot see the cervix I feel that this is a wasted update and unfortunately this update falls into that category. Its a shame as I was really looking forward to seeing Bambis cervix.
I want to see cervix, nothing else. The inner vaginal walls fascinate me not that much despite you dont need speculum to see them, some girls can make them visible with their hands too. With this speculum in this set we can not see the cervix (as other users previous mentioned) so it makes no sense. However the set is not bad as the photos 43 to 61 are enjoyable.
You can't see a cervix of a girl whose pussy is very tight. My colleague did what he could but this is one of the tightest pussies he has ever filmed and there was no way he could get to the cervix.
Love it, bring on Silvie Delux and Kira with this speculum, oh yeahhhh.
Oh yes: Silvie Deluxe. And Barbora. These women have big holes and I think that they can bring the new speculum to the maximum setting and we can enjoy insights extreme pussies.
I am always grateful with the PJ team for always trying to take into account a wide variety of suggestions and tastes. The survey is a great tool for exploring the trends and justification in pleasing what the majority demands.
For me, I don´t need much innovation, I´m satisfied with a beautiful model (something PJ is excellent at) with a plastic speculum (less obstruction for contemplating the labia, clitoris etc.) in various poses. An exciting plus is achieved when the model is relaxed/excited and the vagina is expanded wide enough for enticing cervix movements ( like in the video "Inside Alice Nice"), these kind of things are what makes PJ unique in the whole web.
Yes, I love big holes. But even if it's small, I like to see close up of max extended omanko. Of course the girl has to be beautiful like Bambi or Nathaly.デカマンコも好きだけど小ちゃくってもビンビンに広げたやつの拡大画像だっていいじゃん。もちろんバンビやナタリーみたいに美人じゃないとだめ。
I love speculums metal ot plastic whatever. I love cervixes, keep up the great work providing variety of spread pussies
We have not seen usage of this speculum since months. It is time to blow the dust from its blades and insert it in a beautiful cunt.
"Of course, in some cases (such as Alex) we have to admit that we made a mistake." Hmm, go and look at the ratio of up to down votes on Alex's sets now, after a few years. Sure, she was controversial with a few very noisy objectors. But her 'numbers' now show that she was anything but a mistake.
Maybe a model like Alex, with her magnificent mature cunt, every now and again, or perhaps as a bonus, might be popular. Sure, there are some who demand lots of 'fresh' young models, but those of us that have actual experience know that variety is the spice of life